Bookmark Us

Latest Blogs

  • Tilley: Will IHT reforms really threaten pension saving?

    The Government’s decision to bring most unused pension funds and lump sum death benefits within the scope of inheritance tax (IHT) from 6 April 2027 has provoked widespread criticism from across the pensions industry. Providers, advisers and trade bodies have warned that the change risks undermining confidence in pension saving and damaging long term retirement provision.

  • Lisa Webster: Salary sacrifice cap will hit some hard

    The headline story from Budget 2025 - in the pension world at least - was the plan to cap National Insurance relief for pension contributions paid through salary sacrifice at £2,000 a year.

  • Tilley: Rebooting the FOS makes sense

    I’ve written before about the lack of coherence in the UK’s pension complaints landscape and it remains a source of real frustration for those of us working in the sector.

  • Lisa Webster: Pension age uncertainty lingers on

    We’ve known for many years that normal minimum pension age, NMPA it's known, is going up.

  • Lisa Webster: Beware IHT and pensions double taxation

    One of the most disliked aspects of bringing pensions into the estate for inheritance tax (IHT) purposes from 6 April 2027 is the double taxation that will occur when the member dies on or after their 75th birthday.

Popular News

Latest News
A third of retirement savers plan to rely on ISAs for the bulk of their retirement income rather than pensions, research suggests.

Advisers have almost wholeheartedly backed SSASs despite calls for a ban.

The FCA is planning to update the methodology used to calculate redress owed to consumers given unsuitable advice to transfer out of a defined benefit pension scheme.

Pension professionals are unhappy that the Chancellor has ploughed ahead with the cut of the Money Purchase Annual Allowance.

Chancellor Philip Hammond is to impose a 25% tax charge on pension transfers to QROPS pension schemes from tomorrow (9 March).

The FOS has ruled a firm was wrong over its claims that a man it advised was an insistent client and ordered it to pay compensation.

Subscriber Login

Please log-in or register to read site content