Latest Blogs
Popular News
-
Hargreaves Lansdown hits landmark 2m clients
Investment platform and SIPP provider Hargreaves Lansdown has notched up its milestone 2 millionth client and has also seen record assets under management, according to its 2025 Annual Report.
-
Failed SIPP firm clients updated ahead of legal judgment
Clients of failed SIPP provider Hartley Pensions Limited - who have had funds ring-fenced - have been given an update from joint administrators UHY Hacker Young ahead of a legal judgment expected in late October.
-
JPMorgan to replace Nutmeg with new investment platform
JPMorgan is to launch a retail wealth management and investment business with its own DIY investment platform next month.
-
5 year gap between dream retirement age and expectation
While people dream about retiring at 62 they do not expect to be able to retire until they hit 67, according to new research.
-
Sales of escalating annuities surge
Sales of escalating Guaranteed Income for Life annuities that have some inflation protection, accounted for a fifth of all sales in 2024/25 and have increased by 17% year-on-year.
Mike Morrison: A reminder of need for Permitted Investments
It was trailed as a programme about pension freedoms but in essence many of the stories were about how people had lost money by investing in ‘esoteric investments’ via their pensions or, as they proudly said, their SIPPs.
Of the cases covered, one had invested in store pods and another into a healthcare company that could no longer be traced. Why did they move their ‘safe’ investment into something that was not so safe? As it turned out, for the usual reasons – the search for greater ‘guaranteed’ growth and being convinced by smooth talking sales representatives.
This brought to mind a conversation with an adviser from just a few days before. He had been trying to contact a potential client for a decision only to find out that the person was in Cape Verde. He knew at that point that he would not advise that person – an investment had been mooted in a Cape Verde fund and the client had been flown there for a ‘due diligence visit’.
At the same time, the FCA is reportedly looking at what it deems to be high-risk investments held in SIPPs – specifically whether they should take action on a market with a rapidly increasing number of complaints. In the year to March 2017 the Financial Services Compensation Scheme received 3,565 complaints from consumers and paid out £105 million for these complaints.
It appears that the FCA has requested a range of information from SIPP operators looking at various ways of accessing such investments, such as:
• by an adviser
• execution-only or insistent client
• via an unregulated introducer
• direct, on a non-advised basis
It still strikes me that this is relatively easily avoided by a permitted list of regulated investments for SIPPS.
Most advisers will not recommend non-regulated investments but have to pay their part towards the FSCS levy for such investments. The word ‘unregulated’ means what it says – no comeback on default means it doesn’t make the list.
We often talk about ‘scams’ in pensions when the money is in the client’s bank but there are many other ways the word can be construed within the pensions world.
One area to keep an eye on is so-called ‘international SIPPs’, aka ‘QROPS’ but now using the trusted SIPP acronym to facilitate transfers offshore. I think we will read a lot more on this in the coming months.
Mike Morrison is head of platform technical, AJ Bell