Latest Blogs
Popular News
-
Hargreaves Lansdown hits landmark 2m clients
Investment platform and SIPP provider Hargreaves Lansdown has notched up its milestone 2 millionth client and has also seen record assets under management, according to its 2025 Annual Report.
-
Failed SIPP firm clients updated ahead of legal judgment
Clients of failed SIPP provider Hartley Pensions Limited - who have had funds ring-fenced - have been given an update from joint administrators UHY Hacker Young ahead of a legal judgment expected in late October.
-
JPMorgan to replace Nutmeg with new investment platform
JPMorgan is to launch a retail wealth management and investment business with its own DIY investment platform next month.
-
5 year gap between dream retirement age and expectation
While people dream about retiring at 62 they do not expect to be able to retire until they hit 67, according to new research.
-
Sales of escalating annuities surge
Sales of escalating Guaranteed Income for Life annuities that have some inflation protection, accounted for a fifth of all sales in 2024/25 and have increased by 17% year-on-year.
Elaine Turtle: Budget relief over pensions tax
The flip side of leaving our pension system alone, is that some of the anomalies haven’t been ironed out or removed. These would include the issues surrounding the lifetime allowance. Since its introduction in 2006, the lifetime allowance has gone from £1.50m to a peak in 2011 of £1.80m back down to the current level of £1.03m. In fact in the latest Budget it was announced that it would increase again by CPI to £1.055m, it should have in fact been £1,054,800 but they have sensibly rounded this up, a little Budget benefit.
Removing the lifetime allowance would simplify pensions and eliminate the unintended consequence of penalising prudent long-term savers that have received good investment returns, or have put pension saving ahead of other expenditure. It just seems nonsensical that we can have a pension system that means advisers have to tell their clients to be more prudent in their long term savings, so as to avoid breaching the lifetime allowance, or breach it and pay the tax charge.
What would make most sense would be to remove the lifetime allowance and rely on the annual allowance to ensure that wealthy individuals don't just pile money in and reap the tax relief gains.
Being sensible about it, I guess it is all a bit of a pipedream as it isn’t as easy as you would imagine to remove the life time allowance. It would take a change in legislation and isn’t necessarily a vote winner, even if it is a sensible thing to do for all savers.
Elaine Turtle, Director, DP Pensions