Latest Blogs
Popular News
-
Hargreaves Lansdown hits landmark 2m clients
Investment platform and SIPP provider Hargreaves Lansdown has notched up its milestone 2 millionth client and has also seen record assets under management, according to its 2025 Annual Report.
-
Failed SIPP firm clients updated ahead of legal judgment
Clients of failed SIPP provider Hartley Pensions Limited - who have had funds ring-fenced - have been given an update from joint administrators UHY Hacker Young ahead of a legal judgment expected in late October.
-
JPMorgan to replace Nutmeg with new investment platform
JPMorgan is to launch a retail wealth management and investment business with its own DIY investment platform next month.
-
5 year gap between dream retirement age and expectation
While people dream about retiring at 62 they do not expect to be able to retire until they hit 67, according to new research.
-
Sales of escalating annuities surge
Sales of escalating Guaranteed Income for Life annuities that have some inflation protection, accounted for a fifth of all sales in 2024/25 and have increased by 17% year-on-year.
FCA says no Sipps capital adequacy policy statement until end of 2013
There had previously been speculation in the industry that it would be issued in September but the FCA said this was not the case.
The initial consultation paper titled 'CP 12/33 A new capital regime for Self-Invested Personal Pension operators' was first issued in November 2012 by the former Financial Services Authority. A consultation was then opened for people to submit responses until 22 February 2013.
{desktop}{/desktop}{mobile}{/mobile}
The paper proposed that the minimum amount of capital held by Sipp providers should be increased from £5,000 to £20,000.
It also proposed an additional capital surcharge dependent on the volume of non-standard assets held by the provider. These were defined as assets which incur additional time and costs to be transferred to another provider.
However, the issue that commercial property was defined as a non-standard asset was criticised by providers. Firms also disliked the fact that the measure was worked out by assets under administration rather than number of Sipps held.