Displaying items by tag: Scotland
Friday, 08 July 2022 15:33
Scottish pension transfer IFAs fails after 34 claims
Glasgow-based IFA Cowley & Miller Independent Financial Services Limited has failed after the firm was hit with 34 claims from clients, most related to pension transfers.
Published in
Articles
Tagged under
Friday, 16 July 2021 11:59
Embark platform arm to add 50 staff in Dundee
Retirement and platform provider Embark is to hire more than 50 people in Dundee over the next few months to boost its platform operations in the city.
Published in
Articles
Tagged under
Wednesday, 12 December 2018 10:30
Fergus McDiarmid: 1 year on from Revenue Scotland’s LBTT reversal
It is almost exactly one year since Revenue Scotland reversed its decision to levy Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT) on in-specie transfers between SIPP or SSAS providers. The reversal followed almost two years of industry debates, and indeed efforts to have the original decision overturned.
Published in
Articles
Tagged under
Friday, 27 July 2018 12:30
Scottish SIPP firm doubles profits and targets England growth
Glasgow-based SIPP firm @sipp has announced a two-fold increase in profits for the year ended 31 March.
Published in
Articles
Wednesday, 28 February 2018 13:05
Webster: Allowance pain: I crave a Simplification sequel
We are rapidlying approach that time of year when we remind clients to make use of all their allowances and make sure any surplus cash is used to top up ISAs and pensions. While ISA allowances are straightforward, pension contribution allowances are anything but.
It hasn’t always been this way.
Back in the good old days of 2006 we had a nice simple AA of £215,000 for all, no carry forward, which rose to the dizzy heights of £255,000 in 2010/11. It all seems a distant memory…
Now we have:
• the standard annual allowance (AA)
• tapered annual allowance (TAA)
• money purchase annual allowance (MPAA)
• alternative annual allowance (AAA)
Throw in carry forward and the split pension input year in 2015/16 and we have some seriously complexity.
It is when we get to the MPAA and tapered AA that things get painful.
The MPAA can be grossly unfair in certain specific circumstances. We have had cases where a bankruptcy order was made before the rules changed in 2000. In these cases the Trustee in Bankruptcy (TiB) has the right to take income from the pension when the member turns 55. So someone who went bankrupt in their 30’s could in their 50’s have their annual allowance reduced to £4,000 a year because the TiB starts taking an income, none of which goes to the member.
There are instances where a member’s fund could be significantly depleted by a pension sharing order and they have severally limited ability to rebuild their funds.
Another not uncommon scenario is someone who gets made redundant in their mid-50s, so may be forced to access benefits to meet living costs, but later finds employment and wishes to replace the funds. Retirement is not the once in a lifetime decision of yesteryear, and moving in and out of retirement is more prevalent, which the MPAA works against.
Finally we have the tapered AA. High earners are politically an easy target, but trying to work out an individual’s tapered amount can be complex and time-consuming.
It would be far simpler to have a single, lower annual allowance for all. The obvious amount would be £20,000 to align with the ISA allowance (with carry forward still available).
This works from the point of view that it is more than enough for the average “man-in-the-street” and the high-earners aren’t costing vast amounts in tax relief. However, it would require a separation of the DB and DC regimes, as it would not be sufficient for many public sector workers with DB accrual, not least of whom those in Westminster. Realistically it could only work if DB schemes were limited by the LTA, and DC by AA.
We’ve had MiFID II, and now looking at the annual allowance rules, it makes me crave a Simplification sequel!
Lisa Webster is technical resources consultant at AJ Bell
It hasn’t always been this way.
Back in the good old days of 2006 we had a nice simple AA of £215,000 for all, no carry forward, which rose to the dizzy heights of £255,000 in 2010/11. It all seems a distant memory…
Now we have:
• the standard annual allowance (AA)
• tapered annual allowance (TAA)
• money purchase annual allowance (MPAA)
• alternative annual allowance (AAA)
Throw in carry forward and the split pension input year in 2015/16 and we have some seriously complexity.
It is when we get to the MPAA and tapered AA that things get painful.
The MPAA can be grossly unfair in certain specific circumstances. We have had cases where a bankruptcy order was made before the rules changed in 2000. In these cases the Trustee in Bankruptcy (TiB) has the right to take income from the pension when the member turns 55. So someone who went bankrupt in their 30’s could in their 50’s have their annual allowance reduced to £4,000 a year because the TiB starts taking an income, none of which goes to the member.
There are instances where a member’s fund could be significantly depleted by a pension sharing order and they have severally limited ability to rebuild their funds.
Another not uncommon scenario is someone who gets made redundant in their mid-50s, so may be forced to access benefits to meet living costs, but later finds employment and wishes to replace the funds. Retirement is not the once in a lifetime decision of yesteryear, and moving in and out of retirement is more prevalent, which the MPAA works against.
Finally we have the tapered AA. High earners are politically an easy target, but trying to work out an individual’s tapered amount can be complex and time-consuming.
It would be far simpler to have a single, lower annual allowance for all. The obvious amount would be £20,000 to align with the ISA allowance (with carry forward still available).
This works from the point of view that it is more than enough for the average “man-in-the-street” and the high-earners aren’t costing vast amounts in tax relief. However, it would require a separation of the DB and DC regimes, as it would not be sufficient for many public sector workers with DB accrual, not least of whom those in Westminster. Realistically it could only work if DB schemes were limited by the LTA, and DC by AA.
We’ve had MiFID II, and now looking at the annual allowance rules, it makes me crave a Simplification sequel!
Lisa Webster is technical resources consultant at AJ Bell
Published in
Comment and Blogs
Tagged under
Tuesday, 23 January 2018 11:48
Lisa Webster: How Scottish tax changes will affect pensions
In April 2017 the Scottish Rate of Income Tax was introduced, which may have gone largely unnoticed by many Scottish taxpayers as the overall basic rate remained at 20% - albeit 10% going to HMRC and the other 10% to Revenue Scotland.
Published in
Comment and Blogs
Tagged under
Friday, 08 December 2017 11:16
AJ Bell warns of Scottish pension problems over tax
Platform and Sipp provider AJ Bell has warned that proposed changes to income tax bands in Scotland could cause pension chaos for consumers, advisers and pension providers.
Published in
Articles
Tagged under
Friday, 19 September 2014 10:44
Sipp firm issues Scottish no vote pensions warning
Pension schemes should not rest easy from Scots voting no to independence, a Sipps firm warned this morning, as experts signalled they still see significant change on the horizon.
Published in
Articles
Tagged under
Monday, 23 September 2013 11:17
Mattioli Woods boosts presence in Scotland
Pensions and wealth manager Mattioli Woods has increased its presence in Scotland with the appointment of new Sipp and SSAS consultant Stephen Wilson.
Published in
Articles
Tagged under